Jirón: Kahlo has released a book with Norma Editorial?
Mary: Yeah, do not you say so?
J: Publishers do not know what to do to surprise.
M: I do not seem bad. It will sell very well what they want. Look at it objectively: it is very good, has a lot of readers in the network, is a pioneer in the world of blogs and has written and photographic material pretty decent. He has nearly 30 blocks and has moved to be well connected. J
Tits and asses, Tele5 strategy to reach audiences. I do not think it sells well, the truth ... readers who have in the network do not know if I will be the q then spend money on books to read, of course, as q have read on the net. I think it's a shame that this girl has been published in Standard and English cartoonists de puta madre q will need to go abroad to draw superheroes to recognize them here.
M: Of course, if you try to compare always going to be outrageous and you will see something better. It happens to everyone.
J: Is that as much as I read things this girl does not see anything in particular q is really good or original ... all right no more. I do like the photos, but I do not seem to have invented gunpowder.
M: It has a beautiful imagination, is sensual, original, has a lot of media culture ... I do not know
not tell you that I look good or bad. Beyond that, it seems logical.
J: What's "cyber pin-up" is a bullshit q means "it pajean with my photos."
M: Well, everyone invents pedantic definitions for things you do, do not be my moral.
J: It's not about being moral. What I wonder is if the photos would be so successful if she came out naked.
M: She does her photos. Moreover does not deny that they are erotic, in fact specializes in erotica. It's boring to participate in events and conferences pornography. And it is an art like any other material, most absurd things I've seen.
J: Vamooos ... Eroticism is art. No pornography.
M: Sure.
J: Well, let's start now to discuss aesthetics, which is the time for siesta.
M: Theorizing about the mechanisms of sexuality is very interesting and pornography is a clear part of the core.
J: That's sociology or psychology, not art. And the pornography itself is simply material to masturbate.
M: Art is everything now depends on how guidance. As it is postulated yes, you're right about pornography, but things are redefined continuously. And there is a generation of artists who are redefining pornography, especially for women. That is a fact.
J: Do not! that is what the postmodernists would have us believe they can not do anything. The art continues to have its codes and rules. It is a simple matter of purposes: if you want to make beauty, sacrifice any other matter so that your work is beautiful. If it is about sex, it is eroticism: not going to get genital close-ups for 5 minutes because that is not beautiful.
M: But this is just the contrary! Pornography is in more places than pussy.
J: No, it is eroticism, which is different, more subtle. Pornography by definition is crude and obscene.
M: It depends on the approach, that's what I'm trying to say: it is purely a matter of nomenclature. Who are we to put the border between erotica and pornography?
J: It is a matter of focus and intentions. Sade is not the same stories that Playboy porn.
M: But art and more so today, is from an established reality to subvert the concepts. And this girl works with a clear nail porn, but also super kitsch, childish, surreal ... I do not know, maybe I see more of what you get.
J: I say that is valid in the sense that we should not send anyone to jail for it, but pornography is not and will never be art. When sex is art is erotic. porn is something else. Never be able to compare "for work and went to eat what is below them" with "Last Tango in Paris."
M: I'm not talking about sex an art where everything is porn, I say that it is lawful to come into play. To consume porn is porn that is clear. Porn directors ranging from artists as they arrive is a cleaning technique that makes the work better and sometimes not even that. But I speak of this particular chick.
J: This chick I think it was fine as Internet phenomenon and that the book will be sold discreetly and little else, because it is so easy for internet phenomenon after pasting the buck in the real world.
M: But is that the Internet is on the street as well. So they try all means today.
J: That the Internet is on the street I know, who you gonna tell. But there are clearly phenomena originating from the Internet and they need Internet features to succeed. This girl linka videos, photos, multimedia makes a roll: a book is a book, and that I doubt reformatting the benefit.
M: But with the material also could have done an exhibition in a museum and would not have been wrong. I would not have offended.
J: I would have seemed more logical
M: Still no videos are pictures and text. What is a book, honey?
0 comments:
Post a Comment